Shining a Light on the 6230 Claremont Project

Shining a Light on the 6230 Claremont Project
Senior housing is currently being proposed at at 6230 Claremont, the old blood bank location. Photo: Anna L Marks
by Jack Gerson, Guest Author

My wife and I have lived on Auburn Avenue for 29 years, adjacent to the proposed site at 6230 Claremont Avenue. While I support the development of a senior care facility at this location, I am concerned that the scale of the 83-foot, 203-unit facility proposed by Ellis Partners and Spirit Living Group presents significant risks to public health and safety.

Several of my neighbors have already communicated requests for systematic risk-assessment studies regarding seismic, traffic, and fire safety. The purpose of this message is to elaborate on the request I made at the February 18 Planning Commission meeting for a systematic shadow and sunlight study comparing the proposed design against a zone-compliant building, accompanied by a comprehensive health impact study.

The developers claim to have conducted a shadow study showing that their 83-foot-high building with a 15-foot setback would admit the same amount of sunlight to the adjacent residences to the east as a zone-compliant building 55 feet high with a 5-foot setback. However, their shadow study is inadequate for the following reasons:

  • Insufficient Data: The study fails to sample enough solar positions, dates throughout the year, and times of day.
  • Lack of Comparative Analysis: The developers’ study does not actually compare the proposal to a zone-compliant building because it does not include step-backs. Per code, buildings over 30 feet adjacent to residential properties must step back one foot for every foot of height above 30 feet. An 83-foot vertical wall will block significantly more afternoon sun than a 55-foot building with code-compliant step-backs.
  • Public Space Impact: The proposed height would place the popular public plaza in front of the Safeway in total shadow during winter mornings, depriving the neighborhood of a vital sunlight source during peak usage hours.
Study shows how the shadow casts over the outdoor plaza in front of Safeway during the winters months in the early part of the day. Artistic rendering: Rockridge Residents for Sensible Housing
Afternoons during the fall season, a wide shadow is cast over houses on Florio and Auburn Avenues. Artistic rendering: Rockridge Residents for Sensible Housing

Inadequate sunlight is a recognized public health concern. I urge you to investigate the following potential impacts:

  • Respiratory Hazards: Increased moisture and mold growth in shaded areas can trigger asthma and chronic lung conditions.
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder: Reduced sunlight can exacerbate fatigue and depression.
  • Chronic Disease Risks: Research from institutions such as the Mayo Clinic and the Harvard School of Public Health links insufficient sunlight to increased risks of cardiovascular disease and certain cancers.

I urge further reviews include a systematic comparison of the current proposal against a zone-compliant building, alongside a comprehensive health impact assessment.

Jack Gerson, BS, MS, MPH, PhD (Biostatistics)
jackrgerson@gmail.com

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Rockridge Voice.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.